Skip to content
Biodegradable surfactants and the OECD 301 series
Test methods

Which test fits which substance, what the 60 % threshold and the 10-day window really require, and how to read a 301B result.

Written by Prof. Katalin Barta Weissert, CSO & Co-Founder · Reviewed by Markus Köck · Last reviewed:

In short

The OECD 301 series comprises six ready-biodegradability tests, 301A to 301F. Each exposes a substance to an unadapted microbial inoculum for 28 days. A substance passes at 60 % of theoretical oxygen demand or CO2, or 70 % dissolved organic carbon removal, reached inside a 10-day window.

"Biodegradable" is one of the least disciplined words in chemistry marketing. Almost everything degrades eventually. The question a regulator, a retailer or a formulation lead actually asks is narrower: does this substance reach a defined degradation threshold inside a defined window under a defined test? That question has a standard answer, and it is called the OECD 301 series.

Series
OECD 301A to 301F
Pass criterion
60 % ThOD or ThCO2, or 70 % DOC removal, in 28 days
10-day window
Threshold must be met within 10 days of reaching 10 %
PureSurf result
F Eco 74.7 % ThCO2, OECD 301B (GLP); F Pro under final assessment

Looking for the CO2 evolution method in detail, including cost, GLP and report reading? Read the dedicated OECD 301B test page

Ready, inherent and ultimate biodegradation

Ready biodegradability is the strict category. It uses a small inoculum, no adaptation period and a short test window, so passing implies the substance will degrade rapidly in most environments. Inherent biodegradability is a weaker statement: it shows a substance can degrade under favourable conditions, not that it will do so quickly in a real receiving water.

Ultimate biodegradation means full mineralisation to carbon dioxide, water and mineral salts, with no persistent fragment left behind. Primary biodegradation, by contrast, only means the parent molecule lost its surface-active structure, which is a much lower bar.

The six OECD 301 tests compared

All six measure ready biodegradability, but they differ in what they track, which threshold applies and which substances they suit. Poorly soluble or volatile materials rule out some methods, which is why the chosen test matters when comparing two data sets.

OECD 301A to 301F: principle, parameter, threshold and best-suited substances.
MethodPrincipleParameter measuredPass thresholdBest suited to
OECD 301ADOC Die-AwayDissolved organic carbon removal, % DOC70 % in 28 daysSoluble, non-volatile, non-adsorbing substances
OECD 301BCO2 evolution (Modified Sturm)Carbon dioxide, % ThCO260 % in 28 daysNon-volatile organics, surfactants, dispersible substances
OECD 301CModified MITI (I)Oxygen uptake in a closed respirometer, % ThOD60 % in 28 daysSubstances needing a standardised Japanese-style inoculum
OECD 301DClosed bottleDissolved oxygen depletion, % ThOD60 % in 28 daysLow-solubility, low-dose and volatile substances
OECD 301EModified OECD ScreeningDissolved organic carbon removal, % DOC70 % in 28 daysSoluble substances screened at low inoculum density
OECD 301FManometric respirometryOxygen demand, % ThOD60 % in 28 daysSurfactants, coloured or turbid samples

The threshold differs by parameter, not by strictness: DOC methods carry the higher 70 % bar because carbon can leave solution by adsorption without being mineralised.

OECD 301B: CO2 evolution

In 301B the test substance is the only carbon source for a small inoculum, CO2-free air is bubbled through the vessels, and the carbon dioxide the culture releases is trapped and quantified. The result is expressed as a percentage of theoretical carbon dioxide, ThCO2, so it measures mineralisation directly rather than through a proxy.

301B is the method most often requested for surfactants in Europe, and it avoids the oxygen artefact that nitrogen release from amine-containing substances causes in respirometric methods. NEXOVANT F Eco reached 74.7 % ThCO2 in 28 days under 301B in a GLP study.

OECD 301A and the DOC methods

OECD 301A (DOC Die-Away) and OECD 301E (Modified OECD Screening) follow dissolved organic carbon leaving the solution and require 70 % removal rather than 60 %. They are simple and inexpensive when the substance is fully soluble and does not adsorb.

For surfactants the DOC family is used with care: surface-active molecules adsorb onto biomass and vessel walls, so carbon can disappear from solution without being degraded and the apparent result overstates biodegradation.

OECD 301F: manometric respirometry

301F measures the oxygen a culture consumes in a closed respirometer and reports it as a percentage of theoretical oxygen demand, ThOD. It handles coloured, turbid or poorly soluble samples well and produces a continuous curve, which makes verifying the 10-day window straightforward.

The caveat is nitrogen: if the substance releases ammonium, nitrification consumes oxygen that has nothing to do with degrading the carbon skeleton, so a 301F result on an amine-containing substance should state whether it is calculated on an ammonium basis.

How to read a pass

A substance is readily biodegradable when it reaches 60 % of theoretical oxygen demand or carbon dioxide evolution, or 70 % dissolved organic carbon removal, within 28 days. The thresholds sit below 100 % by design, because part of the carbon is assimilated into microbial biomass instead of being respired or removed.

The validity controls matter as much as the number. The reference substance must degrade normally, the inoculum blank must stay low, and the toxicity control must show that the substance did not inhibit the organisms meant to degrade it.

The 10-day window

The threshold must be met within a 10-day window that starts once degradation passes 10 %. The window separates substances that degrade rapidly on first contact from substances that need a long acclimation.

That is where many marketing claims quietly fail. A substance reaching 65 % on day 27 after a slow start has not passed the ready criterion, even though the headline number looks convincing. For multi-component substances the window can be waived when components are assessed individually, and a report relying on that allowance should say so.

How to read an OECD 301 report

Work through a report in this order and the headline percentage becomes much easier to trust or discard.

  • Study identity: guideline version, GLP statement, test facility and signature date.
  • Test item: name, batch, purity and whether results are on an active or total basis.
  • Method and parameter: 301A to 301F, and whether the threshold is 60 % or 70 %.
  • Validity criteria: reference substance performance, inoculum blank, replicate agreement.
  • Toxicity control: proof the substance did not poison the inoculum.
  • The degradation curve, not just the endpoint: where 10 % was passed and whether the threshold arrived inside the following 10 days.
  • Final wording: "readily biodegradable" versus "not readily biodegradable under the conditions of the test".

If a supplier quotes a percentage without the method, the duration, the basis and the 10-day window verdict, treat it as marketing rather than data and ask for the study reference.

Where PureSurf chemistry sits

NEXOVANT F Eco meets the ready-biodegradability criterion with 74.7 % ThCO2 in 28 days under OECD 301B (GLP). F Pro is under final assessment: a manometric respirometry test (OECD 301F) gave 78.9 % ThOD on an ammonium basis, but the report is not yet signed, and an earlier OECD 301B study reached 47.4 % ThCO2, below the 60 % threshold. The same GLP programme confirmed the material is non-mutagenic (OECD 471) and characterised aquatic toxicity under OECD 201 and OECD 202.

Biodegradability and toxicity are separate questions and both matter. A molecule can degrade quickly and still be acutely toxic on the way. Aquatic toxicity is reported as EC50 values: algae (OECD 201, 72 h) 11.9 mg/L for F Eco and 1.49 mg/L for F Pro, against 0.47 mg/L for a conventional lauryl amine oxide; Daphnia magna (OECD 202, 48 h) 42.9 mg/L and >5 mg/L against 2.4 mg/L. The reports are in finalisation, so no multiplier is published.

Frequently asked questions

What is the OECD 301B test?

OECD 301B, the Modified Sturm test, measures the carbon dioxide micro-organisms release while breaking down a substance given as their only carbon source. It runs 28 days and reports the result as a percentage of theoretical carbon dioxide (ThCO2).

What is the difference between OECD 301B and 301F?

301B measures carbon dioxide produced (% ThCO2), 301F measures oxygen consumed in a manometric respirometer (% ThOD). Both run 28 days with a 60 % threshold. 301F suits turbid or coloured samples; 301B avoids the oxygen artefact caused by nitrogen release from amine-containing substances.

How long does an OECD 301 test take?

The test runs 28 days. With preparation, analytics, reporting and GLP quality assurance, a signed report normally takes eight to twelve weeks from the day the substance reaches the laboratory.

What does the 10-day window mean?

It is the 10-day period that starts when degradation first exceeds 10 %. The pass threshold has to be reached inside that period, not just at some point before day 28, which filters out substances needing a long acclimation.

Is 60 % biodegradation good?

Yes. For the respiration-based tests, 60 % inside the window is the formal pass for ready biodegradability. Part of the carbon becomes microbial biomass rather than carbon dioxide, so 60 % already corresponds to essentially complete degradation of the available fraction.

Which OECD 301 test is best for surfactants?

301B and 301F are the two workhorses. 301B is preferred when carbon dioxide is the cleaner signal, for example with amine-containing surfactants. 301F is preferred for turbid samples or when a continuous oxygen curve is wanted. The DOC-based methods are used with care because surfactants adsorb onto biomass.

Does ready biodegradable mean the same as biodegradable?

No. Ready biodegradability is a strict, defined classification from a 28-day test with an unadapted inoculum. "Biodegradable" on its own has no test behind it, and inherent biodegradability only shows degradation is possible under favourable conditions.

What is ThCO2?

ThCO2 is theoretical carbon dioxide: the mass of CO2 that would form if every carbon atom in the dosed substance were fully oxidised. Measured CO2 divided by ThCO2 gives the degradation percentage in a 301B study.

Does bio-based automatically mean biodegradable?

No. Bio-based refers to the carbon source, biodegradability to end-of-life behaviour. Some fossil-derived molecules degrade readily and some bio-based ones do not. Only a test result settles it.

Is NEXOVANT readily biodegradable?

Per grade. NEXOVANT F Eco meets the ready-biodegradability criterion (74.7 % ThCO2, OECD 301B, GLP); F Pro is under final assessment and we will publish the signed result.

Content last reviewed: by Prof. Katalin Barta Weissert

Evidence from our own portfolio: See NEXOVANT F Eco's GLP 301B result

Ask for the study references

We share the GLP study references behind every published figure.

Supported by

  • Supported by European Innovation Council
  • Supported by European Research Council
  • aws Austria Wirtschaftsservice
  • Research partner University of Graz
  • Research partner University of Groningen
  • Research partner TU Graz
  • Research partner Medical University of Graz
  • Supported by Creative Destruction Lab
  • Supported by chemstars.nrw
  • Supported by IECT Hermann Hauser
  • Supported by Startup-uni.at
  • Supported by BMK, Austrian Federal Ministry for Climate Action
  • Supported by Science Park Graz
Supported by European Innovation Councilaws Austria Wirtschaftsservice

Spin-off from an EIC Transition (grant agreement #101058142). Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Innovation Council. The PureSurf FlexCo has received aws PreSeed funding from BMIMI.